Logo

TIB index based from the NZ Tax Information Bulletin - kwister.net

Current Time (NZ)
03:37:06
29 Dec 2024

Viewing Volume 29 Issue 003



home   I.R.D. website

Issues: 001  002  003  004  005  006  007  008  009  010  011 

BR Pub 17/03: Goods and Services Tax - traffic enforcement activities by local authorities - GST output tax on infringement fees retained - treatment of fines - GST input tax on acquisition of goods and services

The Arrangement concerns local authority traffic law enforcement activities under the Land Transport Act 1998

Categories:  binding-ruling,   fines,   goods-and-services-tax,   infringement-fees,   traffic  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(004)

Commentary on Public Ruling BR Pub 17/03

This commentary is not a legally binding statement. The commentary is intended to help readers understand and apply the conclusions reached in Public Ruling BR Pub 17/03 ('the Ruling').

Categories:  binding-ruling,   fines,   goods-and-services-tax,   infringement-fees,   traffic  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(008)

Order in Council - Minimum family tax credit threshold rises for 2017-18 tax year

The income threshold for the minimum family tax credit (MFTC), which guarantees eligible low-income working families a minimum level of after-tax income, rises from $23,764 to $23,816 on 1 April 2017

Categories:  family-tax-credit,   income,   working-for-families-tax-credits  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(012)

IS 17/01: Income tax - deductibility of feasibility expenditure

This interpretation statement contains guidelines that the Commissioner considers relevant in determining whether feasibility expenditure is deductible under the general deductibility provisions in s DA 1. The statement applies where, having regard to the nature of the taxpayer's business, feasibility expenditure of the type in question is incurred as an ordinary incident of business and is recurrent in nature. Other feasibility expenditure (for example, expenditure associated with a one-off capital expansion or acquisition) is not covered by the statement. Ordinary deductibility principles should be applied to these situations to determine whether the general permission and capital limitation apply.

Categories:  capital-expense,   deduction,   expenses-feasibility  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(016)

Minor amendment made to Standard Practice Statement 16/01 Requests to amend assessments

Under s 113 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 (the TAA), errors are generally required to be corrected in the return period in which they arose. However, s 113A of the TAA allows taxpayers to correct minor errors made in income tax returns (including RWT and NRWT), FBT returns or GST returns in the next return that is due after the discovery of the error

Categories:  minor-error,   return-amemdment  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(020)

Determination FDR 2016/07: Use of fair dividend rate method for a type of attributing interest in a foreign investment fund

This determination applies to an attributing interest in a FIF, being a direct income interest in K2. This is a type of attributing interest for which the investor may use the fair dividend rate method to calculate FIF income from the interest.

Categories:  dividend,   foreign-investment-fund-(fif)  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(024)

2017 International tax disclosure exemption ITR28

Section 61 of the Tax Administration Act 1994 ('TAA') requires taxpayers to disclose interests in foreign entities. Section 61(1) of the TAA states that a person who has a control or income interest in a foreign company or an attributing interest in a foreign investment fund ('FIF') at any time during the income year must disclose the interest held. In the case of partnerships, disclosure needs to be made by the individual partners in the partnership. The partnership itself is not required to disclose

Categories:  foreign-investment-fund-(fif),   interest,   international-tax-disclosure-exemption  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(028)

Unsuccessful application to set aside statutory demand after taxpayer's breach of binding agreement with the Commissioner regarding tax debt

Elementary Solutions Ltd ('the applicant') was unsuccessful in its application to set aside the Commissioner of Inland Revenue's ('the Commissioner') statutory demand for unpaid taxes. The Court held that the parties had reached a binding agreement, where the Commissioner would not pursue the debt pending the outcome of a separate defamation proceeding. The Court held that an essential term of the agreement was that for the next 12 months the applicant and its director meet their ongoing tax obligations. When they failed to do so, the Court held that the Commissioner was entitled to cancel the agreement and pursue recovery of the applicant's tax debt.

Categories:  access-to-justice,   arrangement,   debt-recovery  
Vol:2017-29 Issue:003_(032)

Contact us 

Valid XHTML 1.1
Checked: 22 Jan 2022